Friday, May 6, 2011

The Irresistible Force Of Political Gridlock

Only two things influence politicians and move our modern political system: money and votes. The impact of these two elements has hijacked our political system from its noble purpose of promoting the general welfare and securing the blessings of liberty. The power of money and votes have generated a seemingly irresistible force of political gridlock in Washington. This gridlock is a precursor to a looming disaster for America's grand experiment in self-government.
All the rhetoric about freedom and equality notwithstanding, the founding fathers established a system of limited federal power maintained in the hands of a relative minority of the populace. With the best of intentions for democratic self-rule the system evolved over these past two-hundred-plus years: political opportunity expanded (amongst ethnic groups, socioeconomic classes, races, genders and age groups) while political power centralized. The federal government is now the single most powerful entity manipulating virtually every aspect of Americans' lives.
The federal government directly controls one quarter of the U.S. economy and is the dominant influence on the remaining three quarters. Where the field of market competition was once in cities and towns across the nation, satisfying customers wants and needs, the levers controlling wealth are all in Washington - the hallowed halls of the U.S. Capitol.
Responding to this concentration of power in the federal government a cottage industry of special interest politics sprang up. Expertly employing the currency of influence, money and votes, that cottage industry has come to dominate the Washington agenda. The players dictate who politicians pick and protect as winners and losers in a high stakes game - a competition worth literally trillions of dollars. The players providing the currency of gridlock are so consumed by the mania of the struggle they fail to consider the consequences of the competition.
The debate today revolves principally around the redistribution of national assets through two means: current consumption at future expense (accumulation of debt); and redistributing wealth to benefit select classes (entitlements and corporate privilege). Special interests with the potential to profit heavily invest vast resources to influence this debate. The people, for their part, are usually satisfied with table scraps - entitlements. The movers and shakers, however, the captains of industry and titans of finance set their sights much higher and play for control of industrial fortunes.
Under current rules federal entitlement programs (Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid) are destined for bankruptcy. A lengthening life expectancy coupled with rapidly rising healthcare costs guarantees the need for reform. However, in a country of 310 million people (225 million of voting age) roughly 100 million receive government healthcare benefits and some 60 million receive Social Security. More than two-thirds of Social Security recipients are over age 62 and represent the highest percent of active voters. The U.S. has more voters over age 45 than under and those voters are all looking forward to receiving their entitlements.
While the corporate elite are relatively few (less than one percent of the population) they bring billions of dollars to bear and millions of votes through the economic engines they control. Adding the corporate elite's wealth to the masses' numbers and you have a self-ruling majority who directly benefit from government largess - a recipe for disaster.
A closer look at the forces opposing one another on the field of political competition, reveals an intractable situation: an immovable object opposing an irresistible force - the same people are on both sides of the tax and spend debacle. Government influence is so all-pervasive, everyone has something at risk and everyone stands to gain. The key, realized by the enlightened few, is the degree of risk and reward varies depending on how one plays the game (an insight for another time).
The enduring truth expressed through the axiom, "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." is evident in our concentration of power in the federal government. We are consumed but the opportunity of self-interest through the benevolence of an all-powerful state. We the people, are the irresistible force of gridlock. We must change course now, or this folly will lead to an unseemly end.

Money, Politics, and Elections

George Washington said it so well, "Few men have the virtue to withstand the highest bidder." Exactly what effect does money have on politics, at what point does money corrupt elections, and when will the monetary cost of winning elections stop escalating?
These are critical questions if the "people" are to elect politicians instead of organizations and their lobbyists.
So how does money get into the political system?
Hard Money versus Soft Money 

"Hard money" is money contributed directly to a candidate or to a political party. It is regulated in both source and amount, and monitored by the Federal Election Commission.

"Soft money" is money contributed to organizations and committees rather than to candidates and parties. It is "soft" money is not reported to or monitored by the Federal Election Commission, making it harder to trace its origins.
Soft money originated in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Buckley v. Valeo 1976. This case ruled that limitations on donations to candidates were constitutional; however, it created a loophole in which organizations could spend unregulated money for "issue advertising;" any advertising that was not expressly advocating the election or defeat of a candidate. 

Soft money can be used for:

o Support for the party rather than the party's candidate 

o Advertising support for political issues (especially those tied to your candidate) 
o Registering voters (especially those you think will vote for your candidate) 
o Hiring people for voter canvassing in neighborhoods 
o Getting people to the polls on election day 
o Campaign administrative costs

Since soft money comes from outside the candidate's election organization, it can be used to attack the opposition, while claiming to come from a neutral source; in effect, negative campaigning by proxy.
Such organizations became called "political action committees" or PACs. Approximately 90% of PAC money goes to incumbents, making it a tool to keep incumbents in office.
Matching Funds 

Matching funds are subsidies limited to presidential candidates. They affect both the primary and general election. Candidates qualify by privately raising $5,000 each in at least 20 states.

Once qualified, the government provides a dollar for dollar "match" for each contribution to the campaign, up to a limit of $250 per contribution. In return, the candidate agrees to limit their spending according to a statutory formula.
From 1976 through 1992, almost all candidates who qualified, accepted matching funds in the primary. That changed from 1996 thru 2006 when Steve Forbes, George W. Bush, John Kerry, and Howard Dean opted out of the program because they could raise more funds on their own. In 2008, rejection of matching funds took a big step up with Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney and Ron Paul deciding not to take matching funds. Once these candidates refused matching funds, they were free to spend as much money as they wanted.
Beyond primary matching funds, the federal government subsidizes the general election. No major party turned down government funds for the general election since the program was launched in 1976, until Barack Obama did so in 2008.
The presidential public financing system is funded by a $3 tax check-off on individual tax returns (the check off does not increase the filer's taxes, but merely directs $3 to the presidential fund). However, the number of taxpayers who use the check off has fallen steadily since the early 1980s, and in 2006 fewer than 8 percent of taxpayers were directing money to the fund.
Fund Raising on the Internet 

In the 2004 presidential election, Senator Kerry broke the internet record by raising $3 million through the internet in a single day. By the end of June 2004, Kerry had raised $44 million through mail and phone solicitations and more than $56 million over the Internet. The 2008 presidential election took another major jump when Barack Obama raised $650 million for his election, more than twice as much as any other candidate in U.S. history, and much of that money came through the internet.

Internet fundraising offers several important advantages. First, it is the cheapest method of raising money. Second, the average contribution on the internet is far less than the $2,000 legal limit per individual, so the campaign can continue to solicit contributions from the same donor throughout the election.
On November 20, 2008, the Washington Post stated the following incredible statistic: "Barack Obama raised half a billion dollars online in his 21-month campaign for the White House, dramatically ushering in a new digital era in presidential fundraising."
What Does it All Mean? 

The ever expanding costs to get elected raise a number of troubling issues and problems:

o The rise in costs to elect candidates to federal positions has been staggering since the 1990's. Without spending limits, candidates have a rising minimum spending floor to win the election. They likely have to spend more money than it took to elect the last candidate to run for that office. 

o Politicians need donations from all sources to accumulate the amount of money necessary to win office. Once elected, politicians need to assure the donors that their money was well placed, or they will not get donations for re-election. Plainly stated, donations buy access to politicians.

The end result is, there are two kinds of politicians with enough money win election:
o Politicians that are wealthy individuals, or 

o Politicians that raise the most cash through contributions.

Do we really want only the wealthy running our country? No. So we are left with politicians bought and paid for by campaign contributors.
After obtaining a degree in political science, I embarked on a career in insurance and government. For the last 21 years, I have worked for local government and government associations. I have written articles, as well as manuals, assisting local government in effectively managing their activities and exposures. I have also provided training in these areas, been a frequent speaker at educational seminars, and acted as President of an association of governmental employees.

2009 Year End Reviews - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly From the American Political Class

Throughout 2009, while the country and its citizens were facing a terrible economy, foreign wars, extreme Congressional partisanship and sniping, no improvements in the major issues facing this country such as the soaring national debt, high unemployment, failing public schools, wide spread drug addiction problems, rising health care costs, and other major issues, what were the politicians worried about? Looking back on 2009, there appears to have been three distinct categories of American political class behavior: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.
The Good
By all accounts, 2009 was a rough year in America. The good news is that I could actually identify some areas where the political class did some good things. The bad news is I could only come up with three examples where the actions of the political class had taxpayers and fellow citizens in mind when they executed their actions:
1) The first example is based on personal experience. I live in Pinellas county in Florida and over the past four years my property taxes have gone down on a year over year basis. They have gone down so much that I now pay about 40% in less in property taxes today than I paid four years ago with a significant portion of that decrease occurring in 2009. There are probably a number of factors, both political and non-political, that have gone into this decrease but the bottom line is that they have gone down significantly. And here is the good news: I still have police protection, I still have fire protection, the schools are still open, the parks are still open, most of the libraries are still open and the roads and traffic lights are still in good shape. This is proof, that on a very local level, excess waste can be taken out of government without substantial reduction in essential protection and services. The primary word in that previous sentence is essential.
2) The second example comes from the U.S. Senate and it was a suggestion and formal proposal to the Senate from Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee. His reasoning: since the Federal government paid about $60 billion of U.S. taxpayer money to acquire a 60% share of General Motors and theoretically save it from bankruptcy, should not each American taxpayer get stock certificates and partial ownership of GM rather than the Washington bureaucrats? After all, since government is able to function only because it takes money from taxpayers, if government acquires ownership in a private company, doesn't that mean that the taxpayers own the company since it was their money? Senator Alexander was the single politician this year that showed he understood the relationship between paying taxes and government spending. Giving individual citizens those shares of GM would ensure more interest in how GM performed going forward since each citizen would have had a stake in its survival, probably giving GM a better shot at survival than it has with government ownership. Unfortunately, the Senator's suggestion was not approved by the Senate.
3) The final example comes from a small town in south Florida, Miami Gardens. In the past year, Miami Gardens city government took the following actions:
- The city payroll grew. Most everywhere else in the country unemployment increased. 

- City employees still got cost of living raises and merit raises. Most everywhere else in the country 
salaries and wages were frozen or reduced. 
- The city increased its financial reserves by about $300,000. Most everywhere else in the country, local 
and state governments dipped into their reserves to cover operating costs. 
- The city upgraded 17 parks and 4 schools. Most other government entities were reducing or eliminating maintenance projects.

How was Miami Gardens able to do all of these positive things in light of a very, very deep recession and the fact that they are not a city of wealthy residents? According to interviews with city officials:
- City employees share both personnel resources and other resources. 

- The city hires only those people they actually need to do the work needed to be done. 
- City officials claim they have the ability and backbone to say "No" to non-essential projects and programs, claiming that they cannot be everything to everybody. 
- Thus, much like the first example above, the Miami Gardens politicians have shown that running a lean, efficient government operation is possible if you are respectful of taxpayers' dollars. All it takes is a little planning and the ability to just say No.

The Bad
In life you have to take the good with the bad so now lets review some of the less than glorious antics that the political class served us with in the second half of 2009:
- Ginny Brown-Waite, a Congresswoman from Florida, was actively investing in bank stocks at the same time she was sitting on the House banking committee to determine which banks got what levels of bailout money and support from the American taxpayer through the Federal government. This is a blatant conflict of interest. Ordinary Americans would probably have gone to jail for insider trading if they did the same thing, apparently conflict of interest and insider trading activities do not apply to Congressional members.
- Senator Hillary Clinton apparently also does not understand conflict of interest theory. She helped pass a bill that allowed a mall developer in New York state to get preferential tax treatment, shortly after the developer made a significant donation to Bill Clinton's foundation.
- Hawaiian Senator Daniel Inouye's staff helped a bank in Hawaii get bailout money from the FDIC after the the FDIC determined the bank was not worth saving. Turns out that the Senator had invested heavily in the bank and stood to lose a load of money unless the bank was saved by the American taxpayer.
- Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut received substantial campaign donations from Fannie Me and Freddie Mac. Two things wrong here. First, Dodd was chairman of the Senate banking committee responsible for overseeing the activities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a clear cut case of conflict of interest. Second, how do two Federal organizations that exist now solely because of taxpayer support and bailout money get to use taxpayer money to support specific candidates for office? Shouldn not government organizations remain non-partisan and not a piggy bank for the politicians who are supposed to oversee them?
- Ex-Congressman William Jefferson of Louisiana was convicted of taking bribes and was sentenced to 13 years in prison. You may recall that Mr. Jefferson was caught with frozen bribe money in his home freezer. This continues the hall of shame tradition of the political class who recently included Congressman Randy Cunningham who was sentenced to eight years in prison for taking $2.4 million in bribes, Congressman Bill Ney who was sentenced to two and a half years in prison for taking bribes, Congressman James Traficant who was sentenced to seven years in prison for taking bribes, and the majority of ex-Governors of Illinois who are either serving prison time, have served prison time, or may soon face prison time.
- 60% of the Congressional members sitting on the House Armed Services Committee received campaign contributions from the very companies that they had previously earmarked pork barrel budget money for. 

Congressman Charles Rangel of New York is being investigated for a number of ethics violations including, but not limited to, non-declaration of rental income, certain assets, and other income.

- In the area of "who really cares about this bill", Congresswoman Anna Eshoo of California and her staff are working on legislation to Federally regulate the sound volume on television commercials. Never mind that TV watchers can mute the sound, change the channel, leave the room to get something to eat, fast forward on their DVR machines, or just ignore the TV for 60 seconds. Why work on Iraq, Afghanistan, soaring deficits, unemployment, failing public schools, etc. when the TV commercial sound volume issue is so pressing?
- In the same vein as Ms. Eshoo's contribution to America, Congressman Jim Moran and his staff are investigating whether erectile dysfunction television commercials should be banned. I did not know this was so important either. As with Ms. Eshoo, let's ignore real issues facing America and work on E.D. commercials.
- And it never ends. Congressman Thaddeus McCotter and his staff is working on legislation to provide up to $300 a month in income tax deductions so that the unemployed do not have to put their pets up for adoption. Maybe if his staff and he were working on how to get America working again, there would be no need for this ridiculous program that would never be able to be tracked and would be rife with fraud. 

Worse than individual Congress people and their staffs working on trivial bills, how about an entire House subcommittee worked on legislation aimed at forcing the NCAA to go to a playoff format to determine the best Division One college football team? Where would this issue rank with the vast majority of Americans today? Probably not very high.

- The fence along the border between America and Mexico was the work of the entire Congress. A 2009 report documented that the construction of the fence is seven years behind schedule, it will cost $6.4 billion to maintain the fence over the next twenty years ($870,000 a day!), and there have been at least 3,000 breaches of the fence where illegal immigrants were able to enter the country despite this billion dollar fence.
- The new Washington D.C. visitors' center was completed but only after it overran it's construction budget by about 50%.
- Congressman Henry Waxman was quoted as saying: "I certainly don't claim to know everything that is in this bill" in referring to the massive cap and trade legislation that is likely to come before Congress in 2010. The troubling aspect of this statement is that Waxman is the official co-author and writer of the bill!
- Recently, who could forget the blatant bribes the recently passed health care reform bill required where a handful of Democratic Senators were able to get breaks for their individual states to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars in exchange for their final vote in support of this bill.
If these actions were not serious and far reaching, they would be comical. Conflicts of interest, trivial projects, wastes of money, sad but true in 2009.
The Ugly
It has been said that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. However, it is difficult to find much beauty in any of the following Federally funded projects since they waste Federal tax dollars on local projects that contribute nothing to solving the major, national issues facing the country today. The only beauty is in the eye of incumbent politicians who waste these taxpayer dollars to support their re-election efforts:
- Exhibits at the Teddy Roosevelt Inaugural Site Foundation - $150,000 

- Restoration of the Portsmouth, New Hampshire Music Hall - $1,000,000 
- Restoration of the Uptown Theater in Philadelphia - $350,000 
- Construction of the Monroe County (Kentucky) Farmers' Market - $250,000 
- Restoration of the Murphy Theater in Ohio - $250,000 
- Restoration of the Slater Mill in Rhode Island - $194,000 
- Restoration of the Pregone Theater in the Bronx - $150,000 
- Construction of the Santa Ana River Trail in California - $100,000 
- Funding for the Myrtle Beach International Trade and Conference Center - $100,000 
- Funding for the Washington (state) Opera - $200,000 
- Funding for the Montana World Trade Center - $134,000 
- Funding for the Arkansas Commercial Driver Training Institute - $200,000 
- Funding to study and educate citizens about the role and importance of the U.S. Senate, located in- Massachusetts - $18,900,000 
- Funding for the Brown Tree Snake Program, funding that was embedded in the 2010 Defense Department budget - $500,000 
- Renovation of the Ritz Theater in Newburgh, New York - $400,000 
- Renovation of the Laredo Little Theater in Lardeo, Texas - $200,000 
- Widening of Bristol Street in Santa Ana, California - $350,000 
- Construction of a bike path in Port Sanilax, Michigan - $250,000 
- Funding for the Museum Of Aviation - $350,000 
- Funding for the World Food Prize in Iowa - $750,000 
- Questionable Medicare claims including such, as an example, paying for blood glucose strips for sexual impotence - $47,000,000,000 
- Government waste due to improper payments across all Federal government departments - $98,000,000,000 
- Conversion of 21 cabooses into a caboose motel in Pennsylvania - $500,000 
- Funding for a remote Pennsylvania airport that serves about twenty passengers a day - $200,000,000 
- Funding for a state of the art radar system for that remote Pennsylvania airport that has never been used - $8,000,000 
- Funding for a remote Montana border checkpoint at the Canadian border that handles about three travelers a day on average and less than $200 of freight a day on average - $15,000,000 
- Funding for the Polynesian Voyaging Society in Hawaii - $238,000 
- Funding for the Forage Animal Production Research Lab in Kentucky- $1,600,000 
- Funding for Swine Odor and Manure Management Research in Iowa - $1,790,000 
- Funding for oyster rehabilitation in Alabama - $800,000 
- Support of health and economic development activities for the Arctic region - $19,600,000 
- A loan to a California company to develop and build an expensive hybrid sports car.... in Finland - $529,000,000

These are just a couple dozen programs that waste hard earned taxpayer dollars. The 2010 budget bills have over 11,000 other such programs, even though President Obama campaigned to keep the number of pork projects like these well under 2,000. The reasons we have state and local governments is to handle state and local needs. It should not be the role of the Federal government to fund local bike paths, widen local roads, renovate theaters, etc. It diverts time, money, and resources from the truly national problems like the two wars we are currently involved in, soaring Federal deficits, high unemployment levels, Social Security and Medicare heading for insolvency, failing public schools, high drug addiction rates and the associated crime problems, the lacking of a national strategic energy plan, etc.
Then why does the political class spend/waste time and money on these clearly local issues and needs? It helps guarantee them re-election by attempting to prove to their own voters that they are adept at stealing money from other U.S. taxpayers and funneling into their home districts and states. Remember, the government pays for nothing, it funds programs with taxpayer money taken from all American taxpayers. Thus, the bike trail in Michigan is being financed in part by taxpayers in Arizona who will never ride that trail. The Polynesian Voyaging Society is being funded in part by taxpayers in Vermont who will never get any benefits from the Society.
A long time ago, the Statue Of Liberty, an enduing symbol of this entire country and its freedom, was in badly need of repair and renovation. The country rose up to privately donate enough funds to restore this national symbol. If the Statue Of Liberty did not merit Federal money several decades ago, why do farmers' markets and bike paths merit such Federal support today?
This pilfering of national tax dollars possibly hides a more dangerous reality. It could be that this generation of politicians, and the ones that have come immediately before them, do not know how to solve the real national problems facing America today. In the 1960s, Nixon declared war on drugs but we still have a major drug problem in this country. In the 1970s, Carter was President when we lived through the energy crises but we still no do not have a national strategic energy program in place. In the early 1980s, the Reagan administration identified the danger of our failing public school systems but today many of our public schools are still failing. In the 1990s, despite numerous wake-up calls (first World Trade Center attacks, U.S. embassy terrorist bombings in Africa, USS Cole attack, etc.) we still do not have the terrorist threat under control, as witnessed by the almost catastrophic airline security breakdown on the Christmas day KLM flight into Detroit.
Thus, it could be that our current politicians work on useless and wasteful local spending programs and worry about the sound volume on television commercials because they are incapable of doing anything else. If they were, than many of our national problems would have been addressed and solved already. That is why the following steps need to be taken to start reducing "The Bad" and "The Ugly" and expanding the "The Good" from the political class:
Step 1 - start reducing Federal spending by 10% a year, for five years, in order to begin weeding out the wasteful, but politically convenient, local wastes of money. 

Step 2 - allow only individual citizens to contribute to political election campaigns since many of the wasteful programs are really bribes, directing taxpayer dollars to companies, unions, and lobbyists in order to get reciprocal campaign donations for incumbents' re-election campaigns. 
Step 3 - hold Congressional committee and subcommittee members accountable for their performance, removing them from committee posts when their efforts are unsatisfactory and wasteful. 
Step 4 - establish term limits for all Senators and Congressmen since allowing them to serve forever is not working. If the President, the most important elected official in the world, has term limits, less important Senate and House of Representative seats should also be limited in term length. 
Step 5 - no Federal money could be spent on any program or project unless it materially affects a substantial number of residents in at least five states, i.e. spend Federal tax dollars on national needs, let state and local governments and private citizens handle the local needs.

While "The Good, The Bad and The Ugly" made for a good Clint Eastwood movie, it does not make for effective and efficient governance. Lets hope that 2010 is better and that somehow some of the steps listed above take hold this year, resulting in a 2010 list of wasteful spending programs and negative political antics that is far smaller than in 2009, less bad and ugly and more good.

Financial Literacy - Political Agenda Priority One

The need for Financial Literacy among populations is not a new one. Former US Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has identified it and currently Robert Kiyosaki and Donald Trump are arguing it is pivotal to the future success of nations. The message appears to be going unheeded in the places where decisions are made governments. Continued failure to ignore the message is going to have impact for two key reasons.
Reason One - The Impact of Reduced Spending Capacity
Within days of the World Trade Centre attacks of 9/11, President Bush called on the American people to go out and keep spending to stimulate the American economy. His message was twofold. Firstly keep spending to stimulate the American economy and by virtue of its size, create a knock on effect to the global economy. The gobal economy is like a shark - it has to keep moving to survive and to do that it needs feeding on money. However given the current level of financial literacy, disposable income is something of a finite resource and we are reaching the upper end of how elastic that can be.
Personal spending is either done via existing resources i.e. salary or through credit. Both however are not limitless. In fact for many, the salary option has dried up. Many people now are using credit cards and other sources of credit in order to maintain their spending pattern. Worse still the signs are showing, that people are now so extended that they require more credit just to meet the existing credit repayments. Some have even gone beyond this extreme stage and we are starting to see personal insolvency rise.
Eventually the ability of these people to spend will be severely limited and as such they will no longer be able to feed the never ending appetite of the economy. Without a constant flow of money at best there will be a slowdown. The possibility of a downturn in an economy is also a very real possibility along with it's knock on effects.
Reason Two Welfare Spending and its upward spiral
Welfare spending is on an upward spiral. As Robert Kiyosaki and Donald Trump point out in their book Why We Want You To Be Rich it has been calculated that the American welfare system is beginning to run up debts to the American people that all the stock and bond markets in the world could not repay if cashed in. They also observe this could very well worsen as the Baby Boomer generation begins retiring making a major pull on an already overstretched resource.
The problem has always been known about but has been moved forward like a ticking bomb by governments all hopeful that it does not go off on their watch. Unfortunately the ticking appears to be getting faster indicating we are nearer than ever to this bomb going off.
Is There an Answer? If there is, its certainly not to repeat the same actions. Furthermore, financial literacy needs to take increased prominence in the nations minds. People need to know how to think more effectively about how they handle their money. One of the best ways to begin this process is to begin with the young. The way to do that is to expose them to financial literacy in the one institution they spend their formative years in - school. This however will need projects and plans to introduce financial literacy to be formulated right now. Not tomorrow, not sometime in the future. Today.
The kind of political will it will take to achieve this means the subject will have to be on the to do list of every man and woman who considers themselves to have some political clout. It's going to have to be on the talking points of every major politician in order to create the kind of groundswell that makes things happen.
Whilst this may sound a major undertaking, politicians respond to two key things which could help get it on the agenda. The first is overwhelming demand for action from the people that vote for them. When these people make enough noise and they feel their position is under threat - politicians respond. The second is when they understand there is something in it for them - recognition as being pivotal to it's achievement and can create a legacy of their time in office - they respond. Once they understand what's in it for them this could become easier.
Well what is in it for the political figures of our time?
If financial literacy is placed in schools we potentially have the ability to produce the first financially literate generation. The resulting impact could be more benefit to individuals and whole social groups than whole reams of legislation and social programs have ever achieved. Combining literacy of both words and numbers provides the foundation on which socially disadvantaged groups and individuals can raise themselves from the various types of poverty they find themselves in.
With such knowledge, they reduce their dependency on others, on society and on their government. The outcomes from this can appeal to those on both sides of the political divide. Finally a bi-partisan initiative that can be a force for good whatever your politics.
If Political figures are still wondering what's in it for them it this. Many talk about the need to do something worthwhile and to leave a legacy for their time in public service. Many get sidetracked and bogged down as the cause they see so worthwhile is opposed throughout their political careers This saps their willpower to get it done and they become a shadow of the person they set out to be in public service. By embracing this cause which can find support on both sides suddenly the opportunity exists to create a political legacy that can redefine the future not only of individuals and of social groups, but of whole nations.
A brighter future exists with action from our politicians and public servants. They just need to rewrite their to do list so that Financial Literacy is on the top.

Partisan Politics Is Destroying America

Newton's third law of motion states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Well, there is no better laboratory to observe the functioning of this law than in the federal government of the United States, most notably through its two party system. No matter the quality of an idea or the promise of a program, if one party offers it, the other party must oppose - adamantly and vehemently. Any sign of compromise, any show of weakness would indicate to well-healed benefactors that the offending politician is not up to the charge - to fulfill the will and intent of that special interest.
The situation in Washington has become so grave, evidently the members comprising the ideological wings of the two dominant parties agree on only one point: under no circumstances should power be diluted or distributed to the people. The more concentrated the power the more accessible the levers with which to manipulate the system for partisan advantage. So over the course of two hundred years power has flowed into the hands of captains of industry and titans of finance by way of the foot soldiers who make it all possible - politicians. The elite and the extremists who prefer this course would rather see the entire system fail, than put at risk their gravy train.
Today our federal republic serves special interests with single-minded focus. The "common good" is a well-worn and long-discarded concept. But this dismissal has not been without consequence. The truth the thoughtful elite are reticent to reveal is that the only way out of the economic and fiscal mess we have created for ourselves is by way of shared sacrifice and pain. To veer from this course of assured self destruction we must at once reshape our economy our governance and our place in the world, and make the ruling elite responsible citizens of the republic which has bestowed on them such ill-deserved favor.
Realizing the common good entails change and renewal - the likes of which have never been undertaken before. The United States is fast approaching a crisis point demanding fundamental change. However, if any nation can change, if any people can commit to remaking themselves - it is the people of these United States.
Carl von Clausewitz, a19th Century Prussian strategic theorist, famously proclaimed, "War is the continuation of politics by another means." In the United States today - politics is war by another means. The weapons are words, the intermediate objectives are votes, and the endgame is power. We ignore the rancor and rhetoric of this game at our own peril. This isn't the meaningless entertainment of weekend sports. At risk are the lives of our children, our integrity and, as dire as it sounds: our sacred honor. We, the people, must bring civility back into politics and must shoulder the necessary burden to begin anew.
So much power, wealth and influence have been ceded to the federal government only the wisest and most selfless among us could dare to wield that power responsibly and justly. As the likelihood of identifying and installing those people bears little promise in reality, the citizens must once again govern. In doing so the people must not fall victim to the "either - or" choices of the polarized parties. America cannot afford "more of the same."
Money, power and ideological extremism have corrupted the system. Relying on the status quo we cannot even begin to steer away from the path of self destruction. Partisan power politics is destroying America. It is time the people take on the task of governing and find a productive way between the uncompromising extremes before it is too late.

Finance and Wealth Building

1. Capitalization 

The term "capitalize" means registering the quantity of an entity in a balance sheet account against the income statement. Capitalizing can be different in different companies depending on their turnovers. But a big company would not do that. Moreover, in case of leased equipment, if it is a disguised purchase and not a rental agreement, then the lease should be capitalized. A process whereby anticipated future income is converted to one lump sum capital value. A Capitalization Rate is divided into the expected periodic income to derive a capital value for the expected income 
There are basic differences between capitalization and depreciation.

Capitalization refers to adding the sum to the balance sheet. Suppose, a house is constructed after taking loans ,then some interests of it will be added to its cost, which in total with the cost will be shown as an asset on your balance sheet.
Whereas, depreciation is the reduced amount registered on the balance sheet. It refers to the systematic allocation of the price of an asset from the balance sheet and reporting it as depreciation expense on the income statement. In short, capitalization refers to the addition and depreciation refers to the subtraction of an amount from the balance sheet.
Though not distinctly different, following types of capitalization are predominant. 

o Mega cap: it includes the companies, whose market capital is over $200 billion. The most publicly traded companies like the Exxon are the leaders, which is not applicable to the majority of companies. 
o Big/large cap: their market capital is between $10 billion and $200 billion. The well noted companies like the Microsoft, Wal-Mart, General Electric and IBM fall into this category. The large capital stocks are considered to be steady and safe. These stocks are also known as blue chips. 
o Mid cap: the companies under this category are considered to be more unstable than the mega and large capital companies. A considerable part of this capital is characterized by the Growth Stocks. Some of the companies under this category are on the verge of becoming the industrial leaders. 
o Small cap: the comparatively new and young companies having the capital between $300 million to $2 billion. They offer the possibility of greater capital increase but leaving the risk factor. 
o Micro cap: The companies primarily consist of penny stocks ranging between $50 million to $300 million. They have equal upward and downward potential and thus are risk prone. You should do a lot of research before venturing into this position. 
o Nano cap: capitals below $50 million are the indicator of this category. This is the riskiest of the categories and offer for very meager gain. The stocks normally trade on the pink sheets or OTCBB. 
o This categorization does vary with the variation in the actual market.

2. Unemployment rate nearing 700ks, it may get worse
The last statistics for the job-cut given by the Labor Department in February this year reflected the worse picture than was speculated in January. The previous one registered 598,000 job-cuts in the private sector, which the February stat projected 650,000. The figures according to Briefing.com were somewhat different, which anticipated a hike of 11% in the unemployment rate from January's 614,000 to February's 697,000. This burning scenario would create wrinkles in the forehead of President Obama and would dent his administration's futuristic expenditure plans envisioning the dynamicity of the stumbling economy in the coming years.
The stark discrepancy between the White House's statement as 3.8% decline of the economy and the daily life of the Americans was evident from the actual 6.2%, the worst since 1982. Economists though are neither ready to compare the severity with that of the 1930's 25% and nor with the twin depressions of the 1980's, yet some are forecasting of more worsening. They are emphasizing on the term "depression" to describe the much longer span of crisis, which cannot be connoted by the term "downturn". The alteration of terms is much more decisive, when the govt. is strategizing to further straining of cash for the critical banks and the aid for the automobile industry.
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moddy's Economy.com, predicted that the unemployment rate would reach 10.5% by the end of 2011, from 7.6% of end January, the average home prices would fall 20% over the already reached 27% and the financial system losses would more than treble, to $3.7 trillion. The chief global economist of Decision Economics, Allen Sinai maintained that the economy is already at depression. He added that Washington's assumption of the 3.2% hike in 2010 should only be a hope, not a confirmation. And in this situation, the government would be bound to reduce expenditure, increase taxes and run larger deficits. The Federal Reserve chairman, Ben S. Bernanke predicted the rise of unemployment rate to touch 8.8% next year as against the current speculated rate of 10.3%.
Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C., censured Sinai for predicting so early and estimated the ratio to over 12%, the highest since 1948. Zandi gave the rate as 9.3%. The inseparable connection among the financial system, the job market and real estate has resulted in the pink slips even in stable companies. This in turn reduces the investment by the laid offs, further cutting on the revenue from different sectors. A downward spiral is thus set to act.
3. Relation between politics and Wall Street.
Since the December take over of the Wall Street Journal by Rupert Murdoch, it has developed a sharp edge on the political issues and asserted its influence on the presidential campaign. With the fresh approach to place journalism on a new trajectory of paramount, Murdoch stressed on a broader cover area in the newspaper. Along with the primary feature on the Federal Reserve's endeavor to salvage the Bear Stearns from the seemingly inevitable crash, it also focused on the Finance Chairman Penny Pritzker and the burning Tibet issue.
In the time of bulk dismissal of the newspaper staffs and financial collapse, Murdoch has raised the volume of the journal and also expanded the Washington bureau, not leaving the foreign coverage. The 1940's approach of the newspaper to focus only on the business news and discount the breaking news is now a history, and it was also called for at the most exciting campaign moment. In fact, politics now occupies double its earlier space in it. It got reflected from the campaign backbiting of the two advisers of Hillary Clinton to the advantage of Barrack Obama in Texas due to the strife between the blacks and Latinos.
With the increased co-existence of finance and politics, the legendary A-heads are losing their importance to be constricted to the page-bottom. Murdoch led the daily for extensive campaign coverage to make it the master of journalism. But this effort may raise the question in future of its becoming the jack of the business journals. 

According to Charlie Cook, a political analyst, WSJ has been barely maintaining its stand in the business, save the business coverage and a fun story on the front page, though the standard has somewhat augmented. To add to the popularity, WSJ has started a weekly sports page, publishes recipes in the Saturday edition and has plans to commence a quarterly magazine on fashion and travel.

Murdoch once donated $1 million to the California Republican Party, had his New York Post go after selected liberal politicians, and yanked BBC News from his Sky TV satellite service in China to appease the Beijing authorities. Despite his well-spoken authority on news judgments, the journal does not seem to have evolved under the News Corp. takeover. According to him newspapers in Britain and Australia had sometimes endorsed Labor Party candidates. 

Marcus Brauchli, the chief editor has stated that Murdoch allows independence to his editors to find the means to achieve the goals he has set for the journal. But at the same time, he also waves his hands to maneuver their decisions, whether visibly or not.

4. "Trend is your Friend"?
It is very crucial for you to follow the correct trend whether you are investing in stocks, dollar or interest rates. There are no such investments that are free of risks, not even the government bonds. 95% of the Americans, having net worth of less than $1,000,000 are not allowed the choices as the rich are. They are also not expected to be that savvy of the risks in stocks, stock options, futures, mutual funds and a whole lot of very high risk investments and presumed to be incapable of understanding the risks in hedge funds. The existing system which relegates most investors to second class status is economically wrong, philosophically decadent and politically discriminatory. 

While a considerable time is given to track the accurate direction of the stock, a cautious observation to the support and the resistance lines can make the trend your friend, as shown below.

These "Trend Lines" directs to the general trends of the stock movement. Not useful for daily tracking, they are used for a long-term purpose for the stock, mutual fund or commodity.
The trend lines can also guide you for even years, than weeks or months. But they are mostly the speed-breakers, as the stocks show their inconsistency to move along these lines, and then spring back to the reverse.
If you are skilled enough to fish a stock as it springs off the support line, which is the ideal time to purchase, as you will find an authentic and valid point to stop. This could be near the support line, just below it and would reduce your amount at risk.
The stocks that are purchased just as the stock breaks through overhead resistance and forms new patterns, ensures the best performers. You should hold the stock for months or even years, until it breaks the support line to enhance your winning chance.
Often the logic behind the stocks' heightened leap is not made up. It can occur after days or weeks or even years. But the leap of that extent to break the trend line is always talked about.
When your stock jumps over its overhead resistance, you can be confident that it would continue to do so. 

One should be careful, if the support line of mutual fund or stock is broken. This will be the high time to sell a portion or the entire position. One will consider at risk, if the support line is broken, which indicates that supply is now clearly in command.

5. What are Trailing Stop and how to use them?
It is equally crucial for you to decide the time to put your hands off the trade as it is to put then on, whether in the case of long-term investing and short-term trading. Usually, selling exerts more pressure on your heart than buying. Therefore, you can not make up your mind when to exit from the trade and when you are profiting from it. Same happens when you incur a loss and cannot think to quit but wait, expecting the recovery. But prioritizing on these emotional deliberations is irrational and illogical. Despite the existence of many state-of-the-art trading techniques, a whole lot of general techniques are also available to save you from awful losses and simultaneously guarantees for awesome profits.
This calls for the use of the Trailing Stop technique. The term "Trailing Stop" refers to a stop-loss order set at a percentage level below the market price - for a long position. The trailing stop price is adjusted as the price fluctuates. The trailing stop order can be placed as a trailing stop limit order, or a trailing stop market order. Therefore, the trader is confident about the minimum profit that he or she is going to gain.
Momentum-Based Trailing Stop:
The trickiest part to set up a trailing-stop system is to predict the suitable profits or tolerable losses. This can be exemplified as a trader's entry to the position after watching and waiting for a consolidation and by placing the stops below that consolidation. It needs patience.
Apart from that, the concept of 'being overvalued' requires basic research. The trailing stops are to be squeezed to a lower percentage if the stock starts to show a P/E higher than its historical P/E. This situation aggravates when a stock enters a "blow-off" period and this can last even up to several months. The daring traders can still continue with profiting by avoiding the losses with the help of the trailing stops. But there is risk.
The Parabolic Stop and Reverse (SAR) 

The traditional traders prefer to stick to the more disciplined outlook in a systematic market and the parabolic stop and reverse (SAR) suites them. It provides stop-loss levels for both sides of the market, moving incrementally each day with changes in price. The SAR is a technical indicator plotted on a price chart that will occasionally intersect with price due to a reversal or loss of momentum in the security in question. When this intersection occurs, the trade is considered to be stopped out, and the opportunity exists to take the other side of the market. The key stipulation of the SAR is the irregularly moving security that in the unbalanced market, your trading charges and other costs will be exhausted. Another clause of the utility of the SAR would be in the security that is not showing a significant trend. You will never reach the stop, if the trend is too feeble. So the SAR is inefficient here and only most suitable in between the two extremes.

6. Work duration on demo account 

The demo account is an account which is funded virtually, but acts as a real one. All the costs and dealings are the replica of the actual business. If you want to open a demo account, you will get ready help from any brokers of Forex . They would provide you with a guidance kit to create it. To proceed, you have to fill up an online form with the help of your chosen broker and after following some simple steps; your demo account would be ready. The virtual fund depending on the brokers can range from $50,000 to $100,000.

It would be helpful for you, if you retune the balance amount of the demo account according to your actual trading amount, as it is not gambling. You will also have to learn the tactics of the trading platform, which is different with different brokers. When they offer for different orders, you will have to be attuned with the facts of placing market orders accurately, setting up targets, preventing loss and other nuances. You must have the answers to the following questions: Are contingent orders available? One cancels other (OCO)? How far from market price can you place limit buy/sell order? And more. These also vary and must be well-researched before investing, as the lack of the knowledge has led to huge amount of losses.
But, don't worry. You have the option to practice it with your demo. Before you start, get acquainted with the technical expertise that the trading software requires. You should also know whether the policy offers for system integration, automated trading, news feed and back testing capabilities. As the software are getting more intricate and are offering unnecessary features, you have to be clear about your real need before opting for them.
A common mistake is mostly done by the traders that they forget about the demo after starting the real account. One more important question is, whether to keep the demo alive, and the answer is yes. You should keep it so as long as possible; whether or not you have to re-register it after every 30 days, as some of them expire after that. Don't forget to check its health regularly by the brokers.
This is required because trading is something that mandates regular updating of the trader's awareness. Be it a tool launched by your broker, a new approach or a new system; first give it a try in your demo. And the most interesting part of it is, it is available free of cost.
7. Use of multiple time frames in trading
To ensure constant profit, you must know and follow the trend that is in, as a trader. The most common formulae include "trade with the trend" and "the trend is your friend". These are categorized as primary, intermediate and short term. But that does not entail that the market would remain in a specific trend, rather in a conjoint frame. It is quite obvious that a particular stock will be in a primary uptrend while being stalled in intermediate and short-term downtrends. It is the common practice of the greenhorn traders to deal in a specific time frame, often overlooking the even powerful primary one and the others usually disregard the importance of the short-term. But, you can have the guidelines as how to keep yourself updated with these trends.
A generalized convention is that the more stretched the time span, the more consistent the signals are. The further you go into the time frames; the charts would become more clumsy and full with deceptive move. To have an idea of their trading patterns, you should start and continue with the primary trend for a considerable time period. As you get the firm idea of the trade, you can venture into the intermediate time frame and then to the short term. For your assistance, some typical trading terms are illustrated below.
o Swing trader: you can focus on the daily charts, especially the weekly charts that set the primary timeframe and the 60-minute charts for the short-term trend. 

o Day trader: the 15-minute charts are useful, where the 60-minute charts would define the primary trend and a 5-minute chart or a tick chart to define the short-term trend. 
o Long-term position trader: while using the weekly charts, the monthly charts can be used to define the primary trend and daily charts for refining the entries and exits.

Although the ideal chart combination is the sole choice of you, yet, you should opt for the main timeframe of your interest and balance it by two timeframes above and below it. You can use the long-term chart to define the trend, the intermediate-term chart to provide the trading signal and the short-term chart to refine the entry and exit. Short-term charts are predominantly used to analyze the decisions taken in the primary chart.
A careful analysis can assure your chances of increased profit. While the long-term charts provide for the traders the advantage to assess their propositions, it also gives a caution when the different timeframes are not organized. The short timeframes give the chance to augment the entries and exits. In a nutshell, the combination of multiple timeframes gives you the complete picture of your trade and increases your confidence.
8. The History of Japanese Candlesticks
The study of candlestick methodology would lead you to the Japanese "Age of Country at War" from 1500 to 1600. It was developed during the military era and often uses related terms. You have to be as alert and cunning as a military general, with the psychology of a competitor and an aggressor to succeed in this battle named business. 

In the mid-1700's, "The god of the markets" Munehisa Homna's research on the price-movement and weather conditions concretized into the concept of candlestick. His "Sakata Rules" laid the foundation of the Japanese investment strategy. The candlestick has always been a very open and widely practiced methodology throughout Japan, but did not create interest in the US market until 25 years back. But the recent economic setback has led the researchers to look up to it. Popularizing this technique to the west is the contribution of Steve Nison's extensive research.

This theory stresses more on the real price action than on the causes of it, as the reports, wages etc. all the statistics are clearly shown in the price and the market would be controlled by the apprehension and the ravenousness of the buyers and the sellers.
12 candlestick models explaining 40 different market signals are available, which are reliable enough in terms of price-move. The 12 major signals provide sufficient outlook for the market-situations, but the others are also useful for profit-making. Though the candlestick uses the basics of a bar chart like the open, close, high and low values over the fixed phase, but it shows various connections of them with the "real body" drawn, and expressed through different colours.
There are 9 fundamental decline and inclined conditions in a candlestick. The lines extending from the candle-body are known as the wicks or the tails, which indicate the high or low of that phase. When the candle-body is clear, it indicates that the close price was above the opening price, whereas, a dark body indicates below. The Doji candle-body refers to the situation of equal open-and-close price. The different candle-models can only predict the directions, but not the extent of it.
Candlestick charts are the oldest to predict the price. They are given interesting names as the black, white, shaven head, shaven bottom, spinning top and the Doji lines and reversal patterns are the hammer, hanging man, engulfing, dark cloud, the piecing and the stars: morning, evening, Doji and the shooting (inverted hammer). This technique is very user-friendly and does not require professional help. The basic advantage of candlestick over the standard bar chart elucidation is its scope for visual analysis of the various market-conditions.
9. Types of Charts (pink denotes unchanged)
Charts are the graphical representations of any information to make the data analysis in a visually convenient manner. They are often created in a tabular form and arranges huge amount of data and their interrelations in a much more easy approach, which would not be possible without them. Among the various types of charts, some are suitable for specific purposes than the others. Having being the point of interest of the Sigma, charts are also essential for a trader for a successful, accurate and technical trade analysis. The currency charts can cover any time period ranging from a minute to a month to even many years.
Open a new Forex Chart by: 

o Through the menu options File > New Chart. 
o Right-click the Market Watch window, then select the Chart Window options 
o Clicking on "New Chart button" on the toolbar 
o Or press the Ctrl + W key combination

Trading charts are used by the day traders to supervise the trade markets, and to speculate as when or not to invest. Trading charts are all equally useful for trading analysis involving the previous and recent prices. Some of the different types of charts are as follows.
Bar Chart: 

This chart is drawn with rectangular bars the lengths of which are the representation of the magnitude or the frequencies that they stand for and they are also known as Bar graphs. The bar graphs can be both vertical and horizontal. The bars show the opening, closing, high and low during a certain time span which displays the direction. They have the flexibility of being set up in any short or long time spans, which vary from 1 minute, 33 ticks, 500 volume to 1 day, 1 week and 1 month respectively. The bars in the bar charts are often represented in different colours to enhance their visibility. They are most popular and are supported by most of the charting software.

Candlestick Chart: 

As said before the oldest of all charts, this chart was developed by the phenomenal Japanese rice merchant Homma Munehisa, in the 18th century. This chart is most simple and easy to understand and therefore is very popular. The candlestick chart shows the standard open, close, high and low market conditions along with the upward and downward direction within a period. It is the most efficient one in terms of visual analysis of data.

Line Chart: 

The line chart is the graphical representation in a two-dimensional manner of the chronological trade rate of the definite currency pair within the given time span. The lines are drawn in accordance with the closing price connections of the day.

10. Achievement of trading perfection 

The moment you decide to trade, take an oath to do it in the best way possible, not compromising on quality. Remember, that trade selection and prior planning are the two faces of a coin. Your success is half achieved through a proper planning, than by hours of trading of anything that comes handy, which is completely incomprehensible. 
Each trade has a proper style, which you must follow to reach the perfection. It involves proper management: planning, organizing, delegating, directing, and controlling.

You will not be able to plan properly, if you are not organized. Make handy your trading software, data and proper equipment. Your own well-being is also not to be done away with. It is said in trade that, there is only the winner or the loser; there is no place for the mediocre. To be the champion you need to have discipline, self-control and a willingness to train extensively. You have to give your leisure to the over charts, studying, thinking, planning and to practicing your trading and the trade selection.
This extensive study involves the study of charts. You have to record the organized and pictures data on the charts in your mind that will intrigue you to ask the questions continually as, "How does what I see in front of me relate to the supply and demand for the underlying?" or "Is what I am seeing on the chart even related to supply and demand, or is what I am seeing related to an engineered move by some insider or market mover?" As soon as you realize the fact that supply and demand do not always solely move or fail prices, it is better. Markets are maneuvered three fourth. 

But the charts reflect something else than the price patterns, as the response to the world happenings, rumours, government reports and many more. The most common thing to be overlooked is the engineering from and by the insiders, the market movers and by commercials holding large inventories. You must train yourself to analyze these things from the charts. For instance, the price patterns on your charts will help you to recognize between true and false breakouts. The pioneer trader will master trading the trend and will get the best out of it. If prices are rising, the trend is up. If prices are falling, the trend is down. The tips and tricks are equally important for you to follow and it is promising to maintain and update a collection of the techniques. To be a master trader, you can not but help practicing the recognition of blockage areas, trend identification and high possibility breakouts. Though a genius never achieves perfection, yet it is always advisable to improve your performance.

Campaign Finance Reform, Or Revolution?

When I was a little boy, we lived in rural Missouri, about 30 miles outside of St. Louis. We lived there until I was nine years old. We lived in a small town, but the world was, for me, a very big place filled with wonders and bulging at the seams, with hope and possibility. In spite of the veiled threat of nuclear war between the Soviets and Americans our government made us feel safe. Even though we had regular "duck and cover" drills at school confidence in our leaders made us feel safe. My parents worked hard, provided for us, and because my dad was a Union member, we all had health insurance. I assumed that everyone did, and I think that at that time most did. I doubt that the world was any more politically stable than it is now, but most everyone seemed to believe that anything was possible. There was abundant hope. I'm sure that this was largely a middle-class phenomenon, but there was a very large middle-class. I think that this was, pardon my pun, "trickle-down" from pretty good leadership. I know now that it had to do with the "industrial military complex" being in its infancy. President Eisenhower would warn us about this institution and those who would control and profit from it, becoming the greatest threat to the freedom of the average American.
In 1958 our family relocated from Missouri to California. There was more construction work for my dad and the Union was very strong there. I remember when we were traveling, being a little boy, it seemed as if we were pioneers traveling to the great Wild West. And you know what, it was sort of... true! Even though I was disappointed that Mexican-Americans didn't wear sombreros, it was to me, exciting and wondrous! It wasn't easy for my folks, but they were able to make sure that we, my younger brother and I, were protected from such heavy burdens of social pressure, allowing us to just be children. We became Californians! Then came John Fitzgerald Kennedy! From what I could tell, my parents who had been life-long Republicans and didn't vote for Kennedy became converts to the charisma and competency of this President, as did very many Americans. When he spoke it was like he was speaking directly to you and he was like Jefferson or Franklin or one of the "framers" reborn. It was obvious that he was a "peoples President"! Born into wealth, he had no need to sell one bit of himself to anyone. His father had stressed that they were fortunate, being wealthy Americans, and that they would be behooved by that fortune to become public servants. In that role, JFK made us all feel like anything was possible and I do mean anything. Take for instance, "We're going to the moon!" And though we did have a standoff with far reaching implications, with Russia. We won! It was a time when Americans felt like and actually were the moral conscience, human rights and social leaders of the World!
Then the turmoil began. John Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas and Lyndon Johnson became the President. Then we lost Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr... then Bobby Kennedy! Though Johnson managed to get the Civil Rights Act passed, he escalated and became obsessed with Vietnam, a mistake and trauma that would overshadow many great things he did and that were happening. The Draft... the conscripting of young American boys into the armed forces would begin the great change. Nixon would begin the de-escalation of the war, but then became the most disgraceful leader in modern American history... The Vietnam War, sold under threat of the domino effect of Communism (bullshit), would be the beginning of Eisenhower's greatest fear. The Industrial-Military-Complex invaded the United States economy, to eventually determine every aspect of American life. Spanning the better part of two decades, Vietnam would give birth to private industry and businesses so rich and powerful that they would gain the ability to "lobby" (bribe) Washington D.C. and influence American policy, law, and social stability. An industrial complex supporting a massive armed force would become an entity of its own, spawning a wealthy class of citizens enjoying privilege like European Royalty. As this class grew and spread into every sector of the economy, someone would have to pay their way. The middle-class became overtaxed, underpaid and underserved, as the Nation's economy began to transfer from the average citizen to the upper one percent (1%). This trend would continue right up to our current situation.
A succession of weak Presidents like Ford and Carter paved the way for the fatal Presidency of Ronald Reagan. A complete sell-out to the rich and powerful businesses, and a promoter of a covert military, he broke the back of the Unions when he broke the Air Traffic Controllers strike, allowing those Union members to be displaced by non-Union employees. The Unions had made possible things like wages that kept up with inflation, top-notch health insurance policies for members, and arbitration with companies to assure employee safety and quality work and goods production. Without the Union protections, American workers would be at mercy of purely profit-based business that looked at the "bottom-line"" as the primary if not their only consideration! His covert military would take up the cause of protecting business interests abroad. The country of the people, by the people and for the people was gradually disappearing into the distance like fading sunlight as night approaches. A very dark picture was taking form in the United States of America.
The blow of the "Bushes" was softened by the charisma of William Jefferson Clinton, briefly, though the Industrial-Military-Complex was still on the march promoting war, profiteering and deregulation of the financial industry to unprecedented levels in spite of warnings that history provided. The transfer of the economy to the top one-percent was escalating at nearly unstoppable speed. All the while, Americans had become complacent and continued to trust that government would, in the end, come to their aid. Over the years since Reagan, Unions had been sold as evil and counter-productive to the economy. Safety in the work place became substandard as the average worker worked longer and harder hours to maintain a secure and stable life-style. A new phenomenon appeared as somewhat of a bewilderment to most, at the time... the presence of a growing "homeless" sector appeared in our society. "Why" wasn't apparent! We couldn't see that if the wealthy remained the top 1%, and the middle-class was diminishing... poverty had to be flourishing! The American way of life had transformed. Things that made us what we were, were disappearing or being stifled and rebranded as counter-productive to our economy. War became acceptable as a sadly necessary part of our culture and the times we live in! International Treaties were deemed inapplicable to the United States government. It seemed that almost out of nowhere America was grabbing people and shuffling them off to clandestine locations, torturing them and defying international law. The government didn't need warrants to wiretap and spy on its people. Privacy was unimportant. Americans, like the enemy, could be locked up without "habeas corpus" in the process, and for indeterminate lengths of time with no legal representation. Two-percent (2%) of the population would, over the course of each year, be incarcerated. Doctors were being assassinated for carrying out legal procedures. Civil rights were first being given to citizens and then taken away in backlashes of the Religious far-right interfering with government and the law. Government mandated that citizens must buy a poor quality product from unethical businesses under the threat of penalties, with no acceptable, reasonable product offered under that law (health insurance). Federal authorities intervened in legal conflict with State laws, arresting people for things that their State had deemed legal (medical marijuana)! Maybe worst of all, no one will take responsibility for the environment of our Planet and the destructive effect we are so obviously having on it. This has all culminated into the financial melt-down of 2009, and still the people struggle for justice and for the government to come to their aid, but it falls on deaf ears that have been silenced by financial reward from lobbying (bribery) by the Military-Industrial-Complex that silently has instituted a coup on the United States Congress, stripping the people of their representation in the Federal governing system. Half measures that appease the people and sustain the power of the top 1%, yet really change nothing, are all we can get out of them.
It's amazing that it seems that no one any longer understands that without the workers there is no business. Jobs outsourced mean less work for Americans. Poor people pay little tax, some none, so revenue diminishes. A small middle-class of workers who can only afford the basics doesn't support a strong economic standard for a diverse business structure. Massive numbers of unhealthy employees do not provide a strong growth-oriented workforce. The more that people must concentrate on pure survival level of existence, the less charitable and able they are to think of, and help the less fortunate. All of these conditions are molding the way for "revolutionary" thinking and chaos. And sadly, the current brands of revolutionaries are not a good thing. They are narrow-minded, self-centered, prejudiced, and radical in ideology. Most support a far-right ideology. They are armed and organized and do not represent the best interests of the majority in society, but they do exist and are becoming more visible by the day. Still we have no leadership that can take up the cause of the Democracy that we once were. I guess they all fear that the financial power of the elitist 1% and their Industrial- Military-Complex, will take away their privilege and lavish life style that politicians have come to enjoy and expect. Most of them are, I suppose... THE Industrial-Military-Complex! Those who do not learn from the experience of history are doomed to repeat it. Do you think that the Romans ever thought that their dynasty would fall? What happened to the great British Empire? Are we doomed to become another 3rd World nation? Are we doomed to evolving into another Russia?
Maybe we just need thorough "Campaign Finance Reform" and to vote out all of the incumbents and establish term limits that prohibit them from becoming entrenched in our representative body and pawns for the Industrial-Military-Complex! Or maybe we need an organized revolution! I fear for the world my grandchildren may be doomed to live in... doomed by us and our, far too many, years of complacency!